It is with great interest that I am following the breaking story about the Alaskan Bimbo's involvement with the Alaskan Independent Party. As this story evolves, it is looking more like she and her hubby have been very close to this group much more recently than first believed. She told them in an address this year to "keep up the good work."
The group's founder was very anti-American. Of course those who would advocate Alaska's secession would be anti-American and traitors, would they not? So let's keep a close eye on this one. It is sure to get more interesting as the days go by and the Bimbo and her handler keep ramping up the abuse of Obama.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Christian Values and McPalin
I am so tired of getting these emails spouting how Obama and the Democrats don't reflect "our" Christian values, whatever they are, because none of these emails give any details. These people are, of course, insinuating that McCain does reflect these nebulous "values." I just want someone to tell me how John Sidney McCain reflects these "values." Please.
Do these "values" include cheating on your sick wife with a rich bimbo, then divorcing her to marry the bimbo? Do they include "cussing like a sailor?" Do they include poor sportsmanship and inciting crowds to the point that they yell "kill him" and "terrorist?" Do they include your teenage daughter, who ends up unmarried and pregnant because you haven't been a good parent and taught her about the "Christian values" that you espouse? Do they include backstabbing those who disagree with you, so that you retain absolute power? Do they include flat out lying on a regular basis?
What are those "values?" I want to know, because I can't find many virtues in McCain/Palin. In fact I can't see how you can base your choice of candidates on "Christian values." Most politicians didn't get where they are by telling the truth. They lie on an almost daily basis. They stab anyone in the back, even their friends, if it means staying on top. Don't tell me these are "Christian values." Just show me how you can base your choice on these "Christian values."
Update:
I kind of thought so. You simply can't explain yourself, when you talk about "Christian Values" and McCain/Palin. I am waiting to see how many responses I get from these "Voting Christian Values" emails that I responded to. My guess? None. There is no response, except for another "Christian" lie.
Do these "values" include cheating on your sick wife with a rich bimbo, then divorcing her to marry the bimbo? Do they include "cussing like a sailor?" Do they include poor sportsmanship and inciting crowds to the point that they yell "kill him" and "terrorist?" Do they include your teenage daughter, who ends up unmarried and pregnant because you haven't been a good parent and taught her about the "Christian values" that you espouse? Do they include backstabbing those who disagree with you, so that you retain absolute power? Do they include flat out lying on a regular basis?
What are those "values?" I want to know, because I can't find many virtues in McCain/Palin. In fact I can't see how you can base your choice of candidates on "Christian values." Most politicians didn't get where they are by telling the truth. They lie on an almost daily basis. They stab anyone in the back, even their friends, if it means staying on top. Don't tell me these are "Christian values." Just show me how you can base your choice on these "Christian values."
Update:
I kind of thought so. You simply can't explain yourself, when you talk about "Christian Values" and McCain/Palin. I am waiting to see how many responses I get from these "Voting Christian Values" emails that I responded to. My guess? None. There is no response, except for another "Christian" lie.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Should We Be Concerned for Obama's Safety?
The Alaskan Bimbo has been on the attack, questioning Obama's relationship with an aging, reformed 60's revolutionary. It is a huge stretch to even pose the question, but when a vicious animal is cornered it will do anything to try to survive. As this egotistical, ill mouthed, re-incarnation of Barbie continues to repeat her unfounded attacks, along with her bad-tempered mentor, their supporters have become more restless and mean spirited.
Videos of the rallies pick up responses to McCain and the Bimbo's attacks. In the background supporters are heard yelling, "kill him" and "terrorist." If these people are unstable enough to believe the lies, is there someone listening to their inciteful talk, who is at this moment constructing a bomb or cleaning an assault rifle in preparation for an assassination attempt? I think there is more than a 90% possibility that planning is underway.
In this country at the moment there are so many radical Christians, who hate Muslims and who believe the insinuations about Obama's Muslim connections, there very well could be a member of God's Army ready to do battle. There are many white supremacist groups that will not tolerate an African American president and are ready to ensure that this doesn't happen. Most of these people consider themselves Republican. Since, their leaders are pushing them toward the brink and not calling anyone to task for the comments, but, instead, continuing to encourage bad behavior, I will not be surprised if there is an attempt on Obama and his family's lives. I don't think they will just go for him. They will try for the entire family to send a message.
If, indeed, something does happen and let's pray that it doesn't, McCain and the Bimbo will have to take some of the blame. They would not be directly responsible, but they have done nothing but encourage anger with their lies and boorish behavior. Nothing has been said to curb the mob environment we are seeing at their rallies.
Tonight in the debate, McCain showed his cowardly side. He and the Bimbo can call Obama names and make broad insinuations about his character and his background, but he is unwilling to look Obama in the face and say those things. I must say that Obama is quite the consummate professional, who was willing to stand on stage with this low-life individual and actually be civil. I could not do that.
Let us hope that I am a wild-eyed pessimist, who is so far out in left field that I can't see home plate. Maybe I making the proverbial mountain out of a mole hill, but I will be very scared for Obama and his family over the next few weeks and into his presidency. Let us hope that the Secret Service is investigating, and I heard tonight that they are taking these overheard comments very seriously. I just hope that they are giving the Obama's the kind of security that they need. On the other hand, I hope that McCain is getting it as well. There are dangerous people on both sides, and the incendiary behavior of McCain and the Bimbo can do some bad things to the unstable minds in the Obama camp as well. Unfortunately, McPalin isn't taking that side very seriously.
Videos of the rallies pick up responses to McCain and the Bimbo's attacks. In the background supporters are heard yelling, "kill him" and "terrorist." If these people are unstable enough to believe the lies, is there someone listening to their inciteful talk, who is at this moment constructing a bomb or cleaning an assault rifle in preparation for an assassination attempt? I think there is more than a 90% possibility that planning is underway.
In this country at the moment there are so many radical Christians, who hate Muslims and who believe the insinuations about Obama's Muslim connections, there very well could be a member of God's Army ready to do battle. There are many white supremacist groups that will not tolerate an African American president and are ready to ensure that this doesn't happen. Most of these people consider themselves Republican. Since, their leaders are pushing them toward the brink and not calling anyone to task for the comments, but, instead, continuing to encourage bad behavior, I will not be surprised if there is an attempt on Obama and his family's lives. I don't think they will just go for him. They will try for the entire family to send a message.
If, indeed, something does happen and let's pray that it doesn't, McCain and the Bimbo will have to take some of the blame. They would not be directly responsible, but they have done nothing but encourage anger with their lies and boorish behavior. Nothing has been said to curb the mob environment we are seeing at their rallies.
Tonight in the debate, McCain showed his cowardly side. He and the Bimbo can call Obama names and make broad insinuations about his character and his background, but he is unwilling to look Obama in the face and say those things. I must say that Obama is quite the consummate professional, who was willing to stand on stage with this low-life individual and actually be civil. I could not do that.
Let us hope that I am a wild-eyed pessimist, who is so far out in left field that I can't see home plate. Maybe I making the proverbial mountain out of a mole hill, but I will be very scared for Obama and his family over the next few weeks and into his presidency. Let us hope that the Secret Service is investigating, and I heard tonight that they are taking these overheard comments very seriously. I just hope that they are giving the Obama's the kind of security that they need. On the other hand, I hope that McCain is getting it as well. There are dangerous people on both sides, and the incendiary behavior of McCain and the Bimbo can do some bad things to the unstable minds in the Obama camp as well. Unfortunately, McPalin isn't taking that side very seriously.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Sound Familiar?
"KUWAIT CITY - A Kuwaiti official says authorities abruptly ended a music concert by an Egyptian singer in this conservative Muslim country when a young female fan jumped on stage, hugged the male singer and gave him a kiss.
Qanas al-Adwani, who heads the government department that monitors public entertainment, says the girl's behavior at Friday's concert "defied the conservative traditions" of Kuwait.
Al-Adwani also said Sunday that the fan's behavior broke controls on public entertainment, which were imposed by influential Muslim fundamentalists after they failed in 1997 to ban concerts altogether. Concerts have to be licensed by the government, and monitors from the Information Ministry watch the crowd to make sure nobody stands up to dance."
Does the above sound familiar in any way? I invite you to visit Prospective Student Expectations at the Bob Jones University website. This noble institution is located in Greenville, S.C. Don't miss General Expectations, Dress Code. and Residence Hall Life.
Don't you just love religious fundamentalists? The are all the same. Their views are so repugnant that they have to maintain a constant vigil to ensure that their "followers" remain Godly.
Qanas al-Adwani, who heads the government department that monitors public entertainment, says the girl's behavior at Friday's concert "defied the conservative traditions" of Kuwait.
Al-Adwani also said Sunday that the fan's behavior broke controls on public entertainment, which were imposed by influential Muslim fundamentalists after they failed in 1997 to ban concerts altogether. Concerts have to be licensed by the government, and monitors from the Information Ministry watch the crowd to make sure nobody stands up to dance."
Does the above sound familiar in any way? I invite you to visit Prospective Student Expectations at the Bob Jones University website. This noble institution is located in Greenville, S.C. Don't miss General Expectations, Dress Code. and Residence Hall Life.
Don't you just love religious fundamentalists? The are all the same. Their views are so repugnant that they have to maintain a constant vigil to ensure that their "followers" remain Godly.
Back to the Old West
In Georgia we are going back to the old west. I have commented before on our Neanderthal legislators and Governor, who insist on legislation to allow conceal carry permit holders to "carry" just about anywhere. These "gun slinging" legislators claim that allowing the carrying of guns will make the world safer and allow these "carriers" to protect themselves.
With all of their talk about protecting children these backward thinking (Did I say Republican?) lawmakers insist that guns aren't a problem. Saturday's Atlanta Journal reported:
"...state Sen. Preston Smith (R-Rome) argued that Georgia parents should worry less about guns and more about other household objects including bathtubs, “because if you are concerned about safety, more children die in the bathtubs than from guns.”
In this case, hard data exist to contradict Smith. In 2005, 1,187 children and teenagers died from drowning, while 3,027 died from gunshots. There were 4,079 drowning injuries, compared to 17,450 gunshot injuries. A child or teen dies every nine hours in a gun accident or suicide.
On those rare occasions when the gun lobby is forced to acknowledge those numbers, it tries to diminish their impact by pointing out that many of the dead are teenagers. Somehow, that fact is supposed to make their deaths less distressing to the community and the families of the dead kids."
The proposed Senate bill that will come before that august body next January only prohibits guns in courthouses, jails, and police stations. Can you possibly see a need to carry a weapon into a library? How about church? The cro-magnon legislators will respond that there have been shootings in churches. Could they have been prevented by "carriers" at church? I doubt it. The perpetrator would get the first shots. Then the "carrier" would have to hit that person quickly. This ain't a wild west movie. Roy Rogers could shoot someone from a horse, wildly out of range of his revolver. You and I can't do that. Trained police officers miss.
I haven't seen our dear governor and his minions removing the metal detectors from the capitol. They aren't going to take a chance, but they will take chances for us. After all they know what is best for us. They are our protectors. I have said it before and I will say it again. I don't want to get caught in the crossfire.
I own guns, and I see nothing wrong with that. I do not carry a gun, because I know full well that I would get shot by someone before I could hit them. I am a lousy shot with a pistol, so there is no telling what I might hit. I can hold my own with a rifle, but you can't conceal those bad boys very easily. I worry most about those who would return fire toward a perpetrator. Would they know to hold fire if innocents were too close, or would they blaze away hitting more innocents than bad guys? The latter is my guess.
Personally, I think "carrier" is a good word for these people. Just like those who carry disease, they carry death concealed under their clothing. It might very well be their own, or most likely an innocent person. Many licensed "carriers" have killed themselves or their family and friends while mishandling their guns. Contrary to what the misguided politicians say, "carriers" are not all gun safety experts by a long shot. Most are not.
With all of their talk about protecting children these backward thinking (Did I say Republican?) lawmakers insist that guns aren't a problem. Saturday's Atlanta Journal reported:
"...state Sen. Preston Smith (R-Rome) argued that Georgia parents should worry less about guns and more about other household objects including bathtubs, “because if you are concerned about safety, more children die in the bathtubs than from guns.”
In this case, hard data exist to contradict Smith. In 2005, 1,187 children and teenagers died from drowning, while 3,027 died from gunshots. There were 4,079 drowning injuries, compared to 17,450 gunshot injuries. A child or teen dies every nine hours in a gun accident or suicide.
On those rare occasions when the gun lobby is forced to acknowledge those numbers, it tries to diminish their impact by pointing out that many of the dead are teenagers. Somehow, that fact is supposed to make their deaths less distressing to the community and the families of the dead kids."
The proposed Senate bill that will come before that august body next January only prohibits guns in courthouses, jails, and police stations. Can you possibly see a need to carry a weapon into a library? How about church? The cro-magnon legislators will respond that there have been shootings in churches. Could they have been prevented by "carriers" at church? I doubt it. The perpetrator would get the first shots. Then the "carrier" would have to hit that person quickly. This ain't a wild west movie. Roy Rogers could shoot someone from a horse, wildly out of range of his revolver. You and I can't do that. Trained police officers miss.
I haven't seen our dear governor and his minions removing the metal detectors from the capitol. They aren't going to take a chance, but they will take chances for us. After all they know what is best for us. They are our protectors. I have said it before and I will say it again. I don't want to get caught in the crossfire.
I own guns, and I see nothing wrong with that. I do not carry a gun, because I know full well that I would get shot by someone before I could hit them. I am a lousy shot with a pistol, so there is no telling what I might hit. I can hold my own with a rifle, but you can't conceal those bad boys very easily. I worry most about those who would return fire toward a perpetrator. Would they know to hold fire if innocents were too close, or would they blaze away hitting more innocents than bad guys? The latter is my guess.
Personally, I think "carrier" is a good word for these people. Just like those who carry disease, they carry death concealed under their clothing. It might very well be their own, or most likely an innocent person. Many licensed "carriers" have killed themselves or their family and friends while mishandling their guns. Contrary to what the misguided politicians say, "carriers" are not all gun safety experts by a long shot. Most are not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
